FE (ITE & Quality) Network's Substack

FE (ITE & Quality) Network's Substack

What IQAs Really Look For

Understanding Risk in Assessment Practice

Gavin Lumsden's avatar
Gavin Lumsden
Feb 04, 2026
∙ Paid

One of the biggest shifts when moving into the Internal Quality Assurer (IQA) role is learning to see risk, not as something negative, but as something that needs to be understood, anticipated, and managed.

Risk in assessment doesn’t usually show up as one big issue. More often, it appears quietly, through patterns, habits, pressures, or assumptions that go unchallenged over time.

This is why effective IQA is proactive rather than reactive.

In this article, I want to share the types of risks IQAs should routinely look out for not to overwhelm, but to support confident, fair, and consistent assessment practice across teams.

Risk is rarely about “bad practice”

It’s important to say this upfront.

Most assessment risk is not caused by people doing the wrong thing deliberately. It’s caused by:

  • workload pressures

  • lack of confidence

  • inconsistent interpretation of standards

  • insufficient time for reflection and standardisation

From a FE Quality Hub perspective, risk management is about supporting people before issues escalate, not catching them out later.

Key areas of risk for IQAs to monitor

Below is a wide-ranging (but not exhaustive) list of possible risks an IQA should remain alert to, presented alphabetically and rooted in real practice across FE and skills.

These are the types of things that, if left unchecked, can undermine consistency, learner confidence, and external assurance outcomes.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Gavin Lumsden.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Essential Teaching UK & Gavin Lumsden · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture